Blog

A strong résumé may get you noticed, and a successful interview may move you closer to a job offer. But when an employer begins contacting professional references, the people speaking on your behalf can influence whether you become the company's next hire. What they say about your performance, leadership, character and ability to work with others can reinforce everything you have communicated throughout the hiring process or introduce doubts at the worst possible moment.

Professional references remain an important part of hiring, even as artificial intelligence, automated screening and digital recruiting platforms transform how employers evaluate candidates. While technology helps organizations identify qualified applicants, references offer something résumés and algorithms cannot fully provide: firsthand perspectives from people who have worked alongside a candidate and observed how that individual performs in real-world situations.

For job seekers, particularly professionals pursuing management positions, executive opportunities or career transitions, building a reliable group of references should be an ongoing career development priority rather than a last-minute activity. Knowing whom to approach, when to make the request and how to prepare someone to advocate for you can make the difference between a routine employment verification and a compelling professional endorsement.

Why Professional References Still Matter in Today's Job Market

The modern hiring process involves considerably more scrutiny than simply reviewing a candidate's qualifications. Employers want evidence that applicants can deliver results, collaborate effectively, navigate challenges and contribute positively to an organization's workplace culture. Professional references provide an additional perspective that helps employers evaluate these qualities before making a hiring decision.

According to the National Association of Colleges and Employers' Job Outlook 2025 research, 88.3% of surveyed employers looked for problem-solving skills on candidates' résumés, 81% sought teamwork abilities, 77.1% valued written communication and 73.7% looked for initiative. Strong work ethic and technical skills each registered at 73.2%, while 69.3% identified verbal communication as important. Although these statistics measure employer preferences in college recruiting rather than the frequency of reference checks, they demonstrate the professional qualities that references can help validate.

The same research found that 52.5% of employers sought leadership skills and 63.1% valued interpersonal abilities. For candidates competing for positions requiring collaboration, client relationships or team management, a reference who can describe these strengths through specific workplace examples can be particularly valuable.

References also help employers distinguish between candidates who appear similarly qualified on paper. Two applicants may possess comparable educational backgrounds, technical expertise and professional accomplishments, but a former supervisor who can describe how one candidate successfully led a difficult project, improved operations or developed colleagues can provide meaningful differentiation.

The value of a reference, however, depends heavily on its substance. A professional contact who offers enthusiastic but vague praise may be less persuasive than a former colleague who can provide specific examples of your accomplishments and professional growth. The objective is not to assemble the most impressive names but to identify people who can speak confidently and credibly about your ability to succeed.

Who Should You Ask to Be a Professional Reference?

Choosing the right references requires evaluating both professional credibility and personal familiarity. The strongest candidates are individuals who understand your work, respect your contributions and are willing to provide an honest, favorable assessment of your abilities.

Former supervisors and managers are often the most effective choices because they can discuss performance expectations, responsibilities, professional development and measurable accomplishments. A manager who supervised you for several years may be able to explain how you handled increasing responsibilities, contributed to organizational objectives and responded to challenges. For senior-level positions, former executives or department leaders who worked closely with you can also provide valuable perspectives on leadership potential and strategic thinking.

Former colleagues and cross-functional partners can be equally important, particularly when applying for positions requiring collaboration. A colleague who partnered with you on a major initiative may offer detailed examples of your communication style, reliability and ability to work across departments. In some situations, these individuals may have observed your day-to-day contributions more closely than senior executives.

Clients, customers and business partners are another valuable source of professional references, especially for individuals working in sales, consulting, business development, entrepreneurship or client-facing positions. Someone who can describe your ability to build relationships, solve problems and deliver results provides an external perspective that may strengthen your candidacy.

For recent college graduates or professionals entering a new industry, professors, internship supervisors, mentors and volunteer organization leaders can serve as credible references when they have firsthand knowledge of relevant skills. A nonprofit board member who has observed your leadership on a community initiative may provide a stronger endorsement than a former manager who supervised you in an unrelated position many years earlier.

Ideally, job seekers should maintain a network of approximately four to six potential references, even though an employer may request only two or three. This allows candidates to select the individuals whose experiences best align with a particular opportunity. A candidate pursuing a financial management position, for example, might prioritize someone familiar with budgeting, financial analysis and organizational decision-making, while a marketing executive might choose references who can speak about campaign performance, brand strategy and business growth.

When Is the Right Time to Ask for a Reference?

One of the most common mistakes job seekers make is waiting until a recruiter requests references before contacting potential supporters. This approach creates unnecessary pressure, limits preparation time and increases the possibility that someone may be unavailable or uncomfortable participating.

The best time to establish your reference network is before actively pursuing a new position. Maintaining professional relationships with former supervisors, colleagues and mentors allows you to approach them naturally when an opportunity emerges. An occasional conversation, professional update or congratulatory message can preserve relationships long after employees have moved to different organizations.

The importance of maintaining these connections becomes clearer when examining workforce mobility. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, median employee tenure was 3.9 years in January 2024, compared with 4.1 years in January 2022. Workers ages 25 to 34 had a median tenure of 2.7 years, while employees ages 55 to 64 recorded 9.6 years. These figures illustrate how frequently working relationships can change, particularly during the early and middle stages of a career.

For candidates already interviewing, the ideal time to contact potential references is when a job opportunity becomes serious, preferably before the employer formally requests their information. After an initial interview or when advancing to subsequent rounds, candidates should begin confirming who is willing and available to speak on their behalf. Employers should generally receive reference contact information only after those individuals have agreed.

There is also an important distinction between preparing references and authorizing an employer to contact your current supervisor. If you are conducting a confidential job search, it is reasonable to explain that your present employer is unaware of your search and request that recruiters not contact current management without your explicit permission. Former supervisors, colleagues or clients can often provide sufficient professional validation until an offer is being finalized.

How to Ask Someone to Serve as Your Reference

Requesting a professional reference should be a thoughtful conversation rather than a casual message asking someone to provide their phone number. The goal is to determine whether the individual is comfortable endorsing your qualifications and has enough firsthand knowledge to offer meaningful feedback.

A strong request begins by reconnecting with the individual and briefly explaining the opportunity you are pursuing. Remind the person of your working relationship, particularly if several years have passed, and explain why you believe their perspective would be valuable. Most importantly, ask whether they would feel comfortable providing a strong, positive professional reference rather than simply asking whether you can list their name.

This distinction matters because agreeing to be contacted does not necessarily mean someone intends to provide an enthusiastic endorsement. Giving the individual an opportunity to decline gracefully helps protect both the relationship and your candidacy.

For example, a candidate might write: "I hope you've been doing well. I'm currently exploring a new opportunity that aligns closely with the work we did together, particularly our experience managing projects and developing business relationships. I really valued working with you and wanted to ask whether you would feel comfortable serving as a strong professional reference. I'd be happy to share more about the position and what I've been working on since we last connected."

The message is professional, specific and respectful of the other person's time. It also opens the door to a conversation rather than creating an obligation. If someone hesitates, provides a vague response or appears uncomfortable, it may be better to approach another contact.

Whenever possible, a brief phone conversation can be especially useful for reconnecting with former managers or mentors. It allows candidates to explain their career goals, discuss the opportunity and gauge whether the individual can provide a confident recommendation.

Prepare Your References Before the Employer Calls

Securing someone's agreement is only the first step. Candidates who want references to make a meaningful impact should provide enough information to help those individuals understand the position and identify relevant experiences to discuss.

Share an updated résumé, the job description, the company's name and a brief explanation of why the position interests you. Highlight two or three accomplishments from your time working together that relate directly to the employer's requirements. This is particularly helpful when several years have passed since the professional relationship ended.

If you are pursuing a leadership role, for example, remind your reference of projects you managed, employees you mentored, organizational improvements you introduced or measurable results you achieved. If the position emphasizes client development, identify examples involving relationship management, revenue generation or customer satisfaction.

The importance of this preparation is supported by research on employer expectations. In a National Association of Colleges and Employers analysis of career-readiness competencies, 96.1% of surveyed employers rated communication and critical thinking as very or extremely important, while 93.9% gave the same rating to teamwork. Yet only 53.5% rated recent graduates as highly proficient in communication, and 55.9% did so for critical thinking.

This gap between employer expectations and perceived candidate proficiency illustrates why specific examples matter. A reference who can explain how a candidate resolved a complex problem, communicated effectively with stakeholders or helped a team achieve its objectives offers more useful evidence than someone who simply describes the candidate as hardworking.

Preparation, however, should never become coaching someone to exaggerate or misrepresent your accomplishments. The objective is to refresh their memory and provide context, not dictate what they should say. Authenticity is essential because experienced recruiters may recognize inconsistencies between a candidate's account and a reference's observations.

What to Do When You Have Lost Touch With a Former Manager

Professional relationships naturally evolve as people change employers, relocate or pursue different career paths. Losing regular contact with a former supervisor does not necessarily mean that person is no longer a viable reference, but it does require a more thoughtful approach.

Begin by reconnecting without immediately requesting a favor. A brief message acknowledging your previous working relationship and expressing interest in how the individual is doing can reopen communication. If the conversation progresses positively, explain your current career direction and ask whether they would be comfortable serving as a reference.

LinkedIn can be particularly useful for locating former colleagues and supervisors, but the platform should be viewed as a starting point rather than a substitute for meaningful interaction. A connection request alone does not establish the familiarity or trust necessary for a strong professional recommendation.

Candidates should also recognize that a former manager's ability to provide a detailed reference may diminish over time. Someone who supervised you 10 years ago might remember your professionalism and general performance but may struggle to recall specific accomplishments. In those situations, providing a concise summary of shared projects can help refresh their memory.

The broader lesson is that professional networking should not begin when unemployment or career uncertainty creates an immediate need. Relationships developed and maintained during periods of professional stability are often the most valuable when a career transition becomes necessary.

Why Your Most Senior Contact May Not Be Your Best Reference

There is a tendency among ambitious professionals to believe that references carrying prestigious titles will impress employers. A recommendation from a chief executive, vice president or well-known industry leader may appear advantageous, but professional status alone does not guarantee credibility.

Hiring managers are generally more interested in the substance of a reference's observations than the person's title. A senior executive who has interacted with you only occasionally may offer limited information, while a direct supervisor or colleague who worked closely with you can provide detailed assessments of your judgment, performance and interpersonal skills.

The most effective references can explain not only what you accomplished but how you accomplished it. They can describe how you managed competing priorities, navigated disagreements, supported colleagues and demonstrated initiative during challenging situations.

This is especially relevant in a labor market where employers increasingly emphasize demonstrated competencies. NACE's Job Outlook 2025 research found that nearly two-thirds of responding employers reported using skills-based hiring practices. That shift underscores the value of references who can validate practical abilities rather than relying exclusively on academic credentials, job titles or years of experience.

For candidates, the implication is straightforward: prioritize people who know your work over people whose names merely look impressive.

The Mistakes That Can Cost You a Job Offer

Even highly qualified professionals can undermine their candidacy by mishandling the reference process. Among the most damaging mistakes are listing someone without permission, providing outdated contact information, choosing an individual who cannot discuss relevant accomplishments and failing to notify references when an employer may reach out.

The consequences can be significant. In a CareerBuilder survey conducted by Harris Interactive in 2012, 69% of employers reported having changed their opinion of a candidate after speaking with a reference. Additionally, 62% said they had encountered references who did not provide positive feedback, while 29% reported discovering fabricated references. The survey included 2,494 hiring managers and human resources professionals and 3,976 workers. Although these findings are historical and should not be interpreted as current hiring rates, they demonstrate how reference conversations can influence employment decisions.

The same survey found that 15% of workers had listed references without first obtaining permission. That seemingly minor oversight can create an awkward situation when a recruiter contacts someone who is unprepared, unavailable or unaware that their name has been submitted.

Another mistake is assuming that every former manager will provide a detailed endorsement. Some organizations restrict employees from sharing anything beyond employment dates, job titles and eligibility for rehire. The Society for Human Resource Management has documented how these policies can limit the usefulness of traditional reference checks. Candidates should understand these restrictions and, when appropriate, identify additional colleagues or professional contacts who can provide more substantive feedback.

Job seekers should also avoid providing references too early without understanding how their information will be used. When a recruiter requests references during an initial application, it is reasonable to ask about the company's reference-checking process and when contacts are likely to be approached. This is particularly important for professionals who are currently employed and need to protect the confidentiality of their search.

What If You Left Your Previous Job on Difficult Terms?

Not every professional departure is positive. Layoffs, management disagreements, organizational restructuring and performance disputes can complicate the process of identifying references. However, leaving an organization under difficult circumstances does not automatically eliminate the possibility of obtaining credible professional endorsements.

Candidates should begin by distinguishing between their relationship with a particular supervisor and their overall performance within the organization. A strained relationship with one manager does not necessarily mean former colleagues, clients or department leaders share the same assessment.

If a previous manager is unlikely to provide a favorable reference, consider someone else who directly observed your contributions. A former project leader, senior colleague or cross-functional partner may be able to offer an accurate assessment of your skills without becoming involved in past workplace disagreements.

Transparency is also important. If a prospective employer specifically requests a reference from a former supervisor with whom you experienced conflict, explain the circumstances professionally and without assigning unnecessary blame. Focus on your accomplishments, what you learned and the alternative references available to verify your work.

Candidates who were laid off should remember that workforce reductions are not necessarily reflections of individual performance. A former manager who valued your contributions may be particularly willing to serve as a reference after an organizational restructuring. Maintaining positive relationships during and after a departure can preserve valuable professional goodwill.

How Professional Networking Strengthens Your Future References

The most effective reference strategy begins long before a job application. Professionals who consistently maintain relationships with former colleagues, supervisors, mentors and industry contacts are better positioned to obtain meaningful endorsements when opportunities arise.

This is where networking becomes more than exchanging business cards or accumulating LinkedIn connections. Strong professional relationships develop through continued communication, shared experiences, mutual assistance and demonstrated reliability. Someone who has followed your career progression, witnessed your professional development or collaborated with you across multiple organizations may become an especially valuable advocate.

For Hispanic professionals and other individuals navigating career advancement, this also presents an opportunity to reconsider cultural expectations surrounding self-promotion. In some professional and family environments, humility, loyalty and collective achievement are strongly valued. These qualities can strengthen workplace relationships, but professionals who consistently minimize their individual contributions may unintentionally make it harder for others to describe their accomplishments.

The solution is not to abandon humility but to become more intentional about communicating professional achievements. Sharing successful project outcomes, leadership milestones and measurable business results with trusted colleagues and mentors helps ensure that people understand the value you bring to an organization.

Professional networking organizations, industry associations, alumni communities and mentorship programs can also expand access to individuals who may eventually become collaborators, sponsors or references. However, participating in the same networking event or belonging to the same professional association does not automatically qualify someone to provide a credible employment reference. The relationship must develop into one where the individual has meaningful knowledge of your work.

The distinction is particularly important for professionals seeking advancement into leadership. A mentor may offer career guidance, a sponsor may advocate for your promotion or recommend you for opportunities, and a reference may validate your performance to a prospective employer. These roles can overlap, but they are not interchangeable. Building relationships across all three categories creates a more comprehensive professional support system.

After the Reference Check: Why Following Up Matters

Once someone has agreed to serve as a reference, the professional courtesy should continue throughout the hiring process. Let the individual know when a recruiter may contact them, confirm that their information remains accurate and provide updates when appropriate.

If you receive a job offer, share the news and express appreciation for their support. A thoughtful thank-you message or personal phone call reinforces the relationship and acknowledges that the individual invested time and professional credibility in helping you pursue an opportunity.

If you do not receive the position, the same principle applies. References should not be treated as disposable resources whose usefulness ends with an unsuccessful application. Maintaining contact, sharing career updates and offering assistance when possible keeps the relationship reciprocal.

Professionals should also be willing to serve as references for others when they can do so honestly and meaningfully. Supporting a former colleague's career advancement contributes to a professional environment where relationships are built around mutual respect and long-term opportunity.

The Long-Term Career Advantage of Having People Who Will Advocate for You

As hiring becomes increasingly competitive and technology changes how candidates are evaluated, professional credibility remains a valuable career asset. Résumés can summarize experience, interviews can demonstrate communication skills and online profiles can showcase accomplishments, but trusted professional references provide independent perspectives that help employers make informed decisions.

The strongest candidates recognize that references are not simply names to submit at the conclusion of an interview. They are relationships developed through consistent performance, professional integrity, collaboration and years of mutual respect.

For job seekers, the immediate priority should be identifying three to five individuals who can confidently discuss their qualifications, reconnecting with those contacts and ensuring they are prepared to speak about relevant accomplishments. For professionals who are not actively searching, the priority should be maintaining those relationships before circumstances create an urgent need.

Ultimately, career advancement depends on more than what you know, where you have worked or how effectively you present yourself during an interview. It also depends on the professional reputation you build and whether the people who have experienced your work are willing to stand behind it.

A strong reference does more than confirm your employment history. It gives a prospective employer another reason to believe that hiring you is the right decision.

Sources

• CareerBuilder. (2012, November 29). Nearly three-in-ten employers have caught a fake reference on a job application [Press release]. PR Newswire.

• Falcone, P. (2023, March 31). How to get great results when checking candidate references. Society for Human Resource Management.

• Gray, K. (2024, December 9). What are employers looking for when reviewing college students' resumes? National Association of Colleges and Employers.

• Gray, K. (2025). The gap in perceptions of new grads' competency proficiency and resources to shrink it. National Association of Colleges and Employers.

• Grensing-Pophal, L. (2019, May 8). Creative and compliant ways to check references. Society for Human Resource Management.

• Maurer, R. (2015, December 16). Reference check checkup. Society for Human Resource Management.

• National Association of Colleges and Employers. (2024). Job outlook 2025. National Association of Colleges and Employers.

• National Association of Colleges and Employers. (2025). Job outlook 2025: January 2025 research report. National Association of Colleges and Employers.

• U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2024, September 26). Employee tenure in 2024. U.S. Department of Labor.