Blog

A plastic cup filled with cold brew, ice and perhaps a splash of oat milk has somehow become the latest symbol of generational warfare in the workplace. The question sounds almost absurdly simple: Is it appropriate to bring an iced coffee into a job interview? Yet a viral debate that erupted after recruiter Caitlin Wehniainen advised candidates, particularly Gen Z applicants, to finish their coffee before walking into an interview has generated hundreds of thousands of views and commentary across the business media. What looks like an argument about caffeine is actually a much larger conversation about professionalism, first impressions and the unwritten rules that continue to shape who gets hired.

The safest answer for job seekers is also the least exciting: leave the iced coffee outside. Not because drinking coffee says anything meaningful about your ability to perform a job, but because a job interview is one of those rare situations where eliminating unnecessary variables works to your advantage. If you have spent hours tailoring a résumé, researching a company and preparing answers, there is little reason to introduce a $7 beverage as another factor for someone to judge.

That calculation matters in a labor market where candidates cannot necessarily afford to squander an interview. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York reported that unemployment among recent college graduates remained around 5.6% through the second quarter of 2026, while approximately 42% were underemployed, meaning they were working in jobs that typically do not require a college degree. The National Association of Colleges and Employers initially projected only a 1.6% increase in hiring for the Class of 2026, although its spring update improved that forecast to 5.6%. In other words, opportunities exist, but competition remains real, particularly for professionals trying to establish themselves early in their careers.

The Coffee Is Not Really The Problem

The argument against bringing iced coffee to an interview is not that coffee is inherently unprofessional. Millions of executives, recruiters and hiring managers walk into their offices every morning carrying coffee. The distinction is context. An employee arriving at work and an applicant arriving for a 45-minute evaluation are operating under different circumstances. One already belongs in the workplace; the other is attempting to demonstrate how they would represent themselves within it.

That is essentially the argument Wehniainen made when the debate went viral. From her perspective as a recruiter with 16 years of experience, arriving with an iced coffee can make an interview appear to be another stop during a day of errands rather than an appointment that warranted preparation. Other recruiting professionals have pushed back, arguing that beverage choice has virtually nothing to do with someone's qualifications. Both positions reveal something important: there is no universal corporate rule against iced coffee. The problem for applicants is that they generally do not know which interpretation the person sitting across the table holds.

That uncertainty makes the decision remarkably easy from a career strategy perspective. Bringing the coffee offers almost no professional advantage, while leaving it behind costs virtually nothing. You may think the interviewer should not care. You may even be right. But an interview is usually not the best moment to conduct an experiment to determine whether your future manager agrees with you.

First Impressions Are Imperfect, But They Are Powerful

Hiring managers should evaluate candidates on experience, skills, judgment and their ability to perform the job. Human beings, unfortunately, are not perfectly objective assessment machines. Research published in the Journal of Applied Psychology found that impressions developed during the initial rapport-building portion of an interview can influence how interviewers subsequently evaluate candidates' answers. Separate research examining mock interviews similarly found a strong relationship between initial impressions and later evaluations, even after controlling for job qualifications.

That does not mean an iced latte will cost someone a career. It does mean candidates should recognize how quickly seemingly irrelevant information can enter the evaluation process. Appearance, eye contact, posture, punctuality, communication style and the way someone interacts with a receptionist can all contribute to an overall impression before the substantive interview has fully begun. Indeed's interview guidance similarly identifies appearance and body language among the first things an interviewer encounters when assessing a candidate.

The coffee adds another visual and logistical element to an interaction that already contains plenty of them. There is the condensation on the cup, the possibility of a wet handshake, the rattling ice, the straw, the question of where to put the drink and the possibility of leaving a water ring on a conference table. None of these things determine whether someone can manage a budget, write software or lead a sales team. But none of them helps demonstrate those abilities either.

Gen Z Is Entering The Interview With An Existing Perception Problem

This is where the debate becomes more consequential than beverage etiquette. Younger workers are not entering interviews on a completely neutral playing field. Some hiring managers already hold negative perceptions about Gen Z professionalism, whether those perceptions are fair, exaggerated or based on limited experiences.

A 2026 ResumeTemplates.com survey found that 56% of hiring managers surveyed had encountered Gen Z candidates they considered unprepared during interviews, while 51% reported poor communication skills and 47% cited inappropriate attire. Another 41% reported encountering what they considered a general lack of professionalism, 38% cited lateness and 30% reported distraction. Perhaps most strikingly, 16% said they had witnessed a Gen Z candidate use a phone during an interview, while 11% reported candidates arriving with a parent, partner or friend.

Other ResumeTemplates.com research underscores how heavily employers say they value behavioral signals during hiring. When asked how younger candidates can demonstrate soft skills, 41% of hiring managers cited good communication, 36% cited professionalism and 27% pointed to punctuality. Half said they had interviewed Gen Z applicants who were distracted or avoided eye contact, while 49% reported encountering candidates who arrived late.

Those findings should not be interpreted as proof that an entire generation lacks professionalism. Survey responses measure employers' reported experiences and perceptions, not an objective characteristic of millions of young workers. Generational stereotypes can themselves introduce bias into hiring. But that is precisely why applicants should understand the environment they are entering. If an interviewer already carries assumptions about younger workers being overly casual, distracted or unfamiliar with traditional workplace etiquette, walking through the door sipping an iced caramel macchiato may unintentionally reinforce a stereotype before the candidate has had an opportunity to dismantle it.

Professionalism Is Changing, And That Is Part Of The Conflict

Gen Z's defense of the iced coffee also deserves consideration because workplace norms genuinely have changed. Tattoos, sneakers, visible piercings, casual clothing, remote interviews and unconventional hairstyles that might once have been considered career-limiting are increasingly ordinary in many workplaces. Even long-standing practices such as handwritten thank-you notes have largely given way to email. An employee working for a technology startup may encounter a radically different definition of professionalism than someone interviewing at an investment bank, law firm or conservative corporate headquarters.

That helps explain why the coffee debate became so heated. For many younger professionals, carrying a beverage is not a statement at all. It is simply part of everyday life. For some established managers, however, the interview remains a formal professional ritual in which candidates are expected to temporarily elevate their behavior above the everyday. Neither side is actually arguing about espresso. They are arguing about whether professionalism should be defined by traditional rituals or primarily by competence and results.

Employers also have responsibilities here. Hiring decisions should not become etiquette competitions in which candidates lose opportunities because they failed to decipher obscure cultural rules. The Society for Human Resource Management has emphasized the value of structured interviews because standardized questions and job-related criteria can reduce the influence of unconscious bias. SHRM has also noted research showing that impressions formed within the opening seconds of an interview can affect outcomes, one reason organizations should be cautious about allowing appearance, personality or other peripheral characteristics to overshadow evidence of whether someone can actually perform the job.

The Interview Goes Both Ways

There is another side to this conversation that hiring managers should not ignore: candidates are evaluating them, too. An organization that becomes excessively preoccupied with whether an applicant carried a coffee may inadvertently communicate something about its culture. A talented candidate might reasonably wonder whether a workplace obsessed with minor etiquette rules will be equally rigid about communication styles, dress codes or everyday autonomy.

Candidate experience has measurable consequences. LinkedIn Talent Solutions has reported that 83% of candidates say a negative interview experience can change their opinion of a company or role they previously liked, while 87% say a positive experience can make them reconsider an opportunity about which they initially had doubts. Earlier LinkedIn research found that 77% of professionals considered the overall interview experience very or extremely important when deciding whether to join an organization.

The smartest employers therefore will not use an iced coffee as a proxy for competence. They will evaluate preparation, communication, relevant experience, judgment and the candidate's ability to solve the problems associated with the role. At the same time, smart candidates will recognize that an interview is a temporary environment in which small details can influence perception. Both realities can be true simultaneously.

So, Should You Bring The Iced Coffee?

Probably not. Drink it beforehand, throw away the cup and walk into the interview with your résumé, portfolio or whatever materials are actually relevant to getting the job. If the interviewer offers water or coffee, accepting it is perfectly normal because the beverage has now become part of the meeting rather than something you carried in from your previous stop.

More importantly, arrive early. Silence your phone. Research the company. Understand the position. Prepare specific examples demonstrating what you have accomplished. Make eye contact, engage everyone you encounter professionally and come prepared with intelligent questions. If you are interviewing virtually, eliminate distractions, test your technology and treat the conversation with the same seriousness you would an in-person meeting. These behaviors will matter considerably more than what you ordered at Starbucks.

The larger lesson from "Coffeegate" is not that younger workers need to surrender to every traditional workplace convention, nor that experienced hiring managers need to abandon every expectation of professional etiquette. It is that interviews remain exercises in perception as well as qualification. Until hiring becomes perfectly objective, candidates must navigate both.

You can challenge workplace conventions after you understand them. You can help modernize what professionalism looks like once you are inside the organization. But when you have finally landed an interview for a job you genuinely want, there is little strategic value in making a cup of iced coffee part of your first impression.

Finish it before you walk through the door. Then make sure the interviewer remembers you, not your latte.

Sources

• Barrick, M. R., Dustin, S. L., Giluk, T. L., Stewart, G. L., Shaffer, J. A., & Swider, B. W. (2012). Candidate characteristics driving initial impressions during rapport building: Implications for employment interview validity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85(2), 330–352.

• Carpenter, J. (2026, September 24). What recruiters say: The shifting do's and don'ts of job interviews. The Washington Post.

• Indeed Editorial Team. (2026, June 16). 20 things hiring managers consider during an interview. Indeed.

• LinkedIn Talent Solutions. (2015). Global talent trends: The interview experience and its impact on candidates. LinkedIn.

• National Association of Colleges and Employers. (2025). Job Outlook 2026. NACE.

• National Association of Colleges and Employers. (2026). Job Outlook 2026: Spring update. NACE.

• Federal Reserve Bank of New York. (2026). The labor market for recent college graduates: 2026 Q2 quarterly highlights. Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

• ResumeTemplates.com. (2026). 1 in 6 hiring managers report Gen Z candidates using their phones mid-interview. ResumeTemplates.com.

• ResumeTemplates.com. (2026). 2 in 3 hiring managers are more likely to hire Gen Zers with soft skills over college degrees. ResumeTemplates.com.

• Society for Human Resource Management. (2026). Eliminating biases in hiring: Structured interviewing and AI solutions. SHRM.

• Swider, B. W., Barrick, M. R., & Harris, T. B. (2016). Initial impressions: What they are, what they are not, and how they influence structured interview outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(5), 625–638.

• Wehniainen, C. (2026). Interview etiquette commentary regarding iced coffee and job candidates, as reported in The Washington Post, People, Fortune and other national media.