Blog

For years, conventional career wisdom suggested that once an employee left a company, both sides should move on. Returning to a former employer could be interpreted as moving backward, while managers sometimes viewed employees who resigned as insufficiently loyal to deserve another opportunity. That mindset is rapidly disappearing as companies confront higher recruiting costs, skills shortages and greater employee mobility.

Today, former employees are increasingly becoming an attractive source of talent. Known as boomerang employees, these workers leave an organization, gain experience elsewhere and eventually return, sometimes to a more senior position with significantly higher compensation. For employers, the appeal is straightforward: they are hiring someone whose abilities and work habits are already known while potentially gaining new skills, industry knowledge and outside perspectives at the same time.

The trend has become significant enough to change how companies think about recruiting. LinkedIn reported on ADP payroll data showing that more than one-third of new hires in March 2025 were returning employees, with boomerang hiring especially prominent in sectors including information, technology and media. Earlier research from workforce analytics company Visier found that returning employees represented approximately 27% to 29% of external hires within its dataset.

In a labor market where every hiring decision carries financial and operational consequences, the former employee who once walked out the door may increasingly look like one of the smartest people to invite back.

The Stigma Around Returning Is Fading

The traditional American career model was relatively linear: join a company, advance internally and eventually leave for something bigger. Returning to an old employer could therefore appear to contradict the idea of continuous career progression, but today's workforce bears increasingly little resemblance to that model.

The median U.S. wage and salary worker had been with their current employer for just 3.9 years in January 2024, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, down from 4.1 years in 2022 and the lowest median tenure recorded since 2002. Among workers ages 25 to 34, median tenure was only 2.7 years, illustrating how frequently younger professionals can expect to change employers throughout their careers.

Those shorter employment cycles are forcing companies to rethink what a resignation actually means. Rather than viewing every departure as the permanent end of an employment relationship, forward-looking employers increasingly see former employees as part of a broader professional network that can remain valuable for years.

Research from UKG reinforces that shift. The company found that 41% of workers would consider returning to a former employer if the opportunity presented itself, while 65% of managers said they would take back former employees who had been top or moderate performers. Another 16% of managers said they would consider rehiring former employees regardless of their previous performance level.

Why Employers Are Embracing Boomerang Workers

Every outside hire involves uncertainty, regardless of how sophisticated a company's recruiting process may be. Interviews, assessments, references and résumés can provide valuable information, but employers do not completely know how someone will perform within their organization until that employee begins doing the job.

Boomerang employees can eliminate some of that uncertainty because companies already have firsthand information about their performance, work habits, communication style and ability to collaborate. Depending on how long they were gone, returning workers may also understand company systems, products, customers, internal processes and organizational culture, potentially allowing them to become productive more quickly than completely new employees.

That familiarity has considerable economic value because hiring remains expensive and time-consuming. SHRM's 2026 recruiting benchmarking data found that the median time required to fill a nonexecutive position was 39 calendar days, while its 2025 benchmarking research put average cost per hire at approximately $5,475 for nonexecutive employees and $35,879 for executives.

The opportunity cost can extend well beyond recruiting expenses. Vacant positions can delay projects, increase workloads for existing employees and reduce productivity, which makes a qualified former employee who can potentially shorten the learning curve especially attractive.

They Can Return With Something More Valuable Than Institutional Knowledge

Institutional familiarity is only half of the boomerang advantage. The strongest returning employees also bring knowledge they acquired after leaving, creating an unusual combination of internal understanding and external experience.

Consider an employee who leaves a company and spends three years working for a competitor, startup or larger corporation. During that time, the employee might learn new technology, manage bigger accounts, develop leadership skills, work with different customers or discover more efficient ways of operating. If that person eventually returns, the original employer may receive an employee who understands its culture while also bringing ideas that could never have been acquired by staying inside the organization.

That creates an interesting advantage over both traditional internal and external candidates. Long-tenured employees possess deep institutional knowledge but may have limited exposure to how other organizations solve similar problems, while outside candidates can bring fresh perspectives but need time to understand the new organization. A strong boomerang employee can potentially provide both.

The financial progression of returning workers also suggests these moves frequently represent career advancement rather than retreat. Visier research found that boomerang employees received an average 25% salary increase compared with what they earned before leaving, indicating that many workers return with greater experience, market value and negotiating power.

A Competitive Labor Market Makes Familiar Talent More Valuable

Boomerang hiring is occurring against a complicated employment backdrop in which companies are simultaneously trying to control costs, improve productivity and compete for specialized skills. Employers cannot afford endless hiring cycles, but they also cannot afford costly mistakes when filling critical positions.

SHRM's 2026 recruiting data found that 97% of nonexecutive positions were being filled externally, compared with 93% in 2025. That reliance on outside hiring means companies repeatedly spend money identifying, evaluating and onboarding people they have never employed before, creating an obvious opportunity to incorporate qualified alumni into external recruiting pipelines.

The broader engagement picture makes maintaining those relationships even more important. Gallup's 2026 State of the Global Workplace research found that only 20% of employees worldwide were engaged at work in 2025, while just 34% were thriving in their overall lives. At the same time, 52% of employees said it was a good time to find a job where they lived, suggesting many workers continue to see opportunities beyond their current employers.

Companies therefore need to prepare for talent movement rather than assume they can prevent it altogether. A valuable employee may leave regardless of what the organization does, but a company that handles the departure professionally can preserve the possibility of bringing that person back later.

The Exit Interview Is Becoming Part Of Recruiting

Most organizations invest significant resources in attracting and onboarding employees, yet comparatively few put the same strategic energy into maintaining relationships after employees leave. In an era of shorter tenure and increasingly fluid careers, that imbalance deserves reconsideration.

Exit interviews can become more than administrative exercises documenting why employees resigned. HR teams can identify high performers who remain eligible for rehire, record their career interests and maintain appropriate contact through alumni networks, professional events and periodic recruiting outreach.

The potential talent pool can be substantial. UKG research found that 62% of former employees felt confident their previous employer would rehire them, yet only 26% had actually contacted their former organization about returning. That disconnect suggests companies should not assume talented alumni will initiate the conversation themselves.

Employers can take a more proactive approach by maintaining alumni databases and encouraging recruiters to periodically review former high performers when positions become available. Organizations can also create alumni communities through LinkedIn, newsletters, networking events and professional development programs, transforming former employees into an ongoing talent and referral network.

Managers Can Determine Whether Employees Ever Come Back

An employee's relationship with a manager can influence whether returning is even considered. A resignation handled badly can destroy years of goodwill, while a professional departure can preserve relationships long after the final paycheck has been issued.

UKG found that 66% of boomerang employees trusted their managers enough to discuss the possibility of leaving before they resigned. Among employees who eventually returned, 77% said their manager had made an effort to retain them, compared with 50% of employees who quit overall.

Those findings should matter to executives because managers frequently determine how departing employees remember the organization. A supervisor who reacts angrily to a resignation may permanently lose someone the company could desperately need three years later, while a manager who responds professionally can preserve a valuable relationship even when the employee cannot be persuaded to stay.

Companies should therefore train managers to view voluntary departures as part of long-term talent management. Strong employees should be thanked for their contributions, given a professional exit experience and encouraged to remain connected when circumstances make that appropriate.

Boomerang Hiring Still Comes With Risks

Rehiring someone simply because the company knows them can be as dangerous as automatically rejecting someone because they previously left. Familiarity should reduce uncertainty, but it should never replace thoughtful evaluation.

Employers first need to understand why the employee left. If the departure resulted from compensation problems, limited advancement, poor management or an unhealthy workplace culture, companies should determine whether those circumstances have meaningfully changed before extending another offer.

There is also no guarantee that returning employees will stay permanently. UKG research found that 47% of boomerang employees surveyed were considering leaving their employer again, demonstrating that rehiring someone does not automatically create long-term loyalty.

Companies should consequently evaluate returning workers with many of the same questions they would ask external candidates. Employers need to understand what the individual accomplished while away, why the person wants to return, what new capabilities they bring and whether the position genuinely represents the right match for both sides.

Pay Equity Can Become The Boomerang Dilemma

Compensation creates another potential complication because employees often receive their largest salary increases by changing companies. When someone returns several years later, the market rate for that employee may be considerably higher than what former colleagues who stayed are earning.

Visier's finding that boomerang workers received an average 25% pay increase illustrates the challenge. An employee who leaves, develops new skills and returns at a substantially higher salary may be worth every dollar, but colleagues who remained could reasonably question why loyalty produced smaller financial rewards.

Companies therefore need to consider internal equity alongside market compensation. Managers should be able to explain how experience, responsibilities, performance and market conditions determine compensation without inadvertently creating a culture in which employees conclude that leaving is the only reliable way to receive a meaningful raise.

The best defense is a strong internal mobility and compensation strategy. Organizations that regularly develop, promote and appropriately reward existing employees will be better positioned to welcome boomerang talent without making those who stayed feel forgotten.

Employees Should Start Thinking Differently About Resigning

The boomerang trend carries an equally important lesson for professionals: how you leave an organization can affect your career years later. Providing appropriate notice, completing responsibilities, documenting projects and helping colleagues manage the transition are not merely professional courtesies; they preserve future options.

Careers now routinely span several decades, while median tenure at individual employers remains relatively short. A company that cannot offer the right opportunity when someone is 28 may become exactly the right employer when that professional is 38 and brings another decade of skills, relationships and leadership experience.

Former employers should therefore remain part of a professional network whenever the original relationship was positive. Maintaining occasional contact with former managers and colleagues can generate referrals, business opportunities, partnerships and potentially another job.

Employees should also avoid assuming that returning represents failure. If the position offers greater responsibility, stronger compensation, better flexibility or a clearer path toward long-term goals, returning to a familiar organization can be just as strategic as joining an entirely new one.

The Future Of Recruiting May Include The Past

The resurgence of boomerang employees reflects a larger transformation in the relationship between companies and workers. Employers can no longer realistically assume their strongest people will remain indefinitely, while professionals increasingly understand that leaving an organization does not have to permanently close the door.

For companies, that makes former employees a potentially valuable extension of the recruiting pipeline. Organizations that build alumni communities, track high-performing former workers and maintain positive relationships after resignations can create a pool of candidates who already understand the business and may return with capabilities the company never had before.

For workers, the lesson is equally powerful. A professional departure can preserve relationships that become increasingly valuable as a career evolves, while the experience gained elsewhere can eventually make someone more attractive to the company they originally left.

The modern career is becoming less like a straight ladder and more like a network of relationships, experiences and opportunities that can reconnect years later. In that environment, leaving a good company does not necessarily mean saying goodbye forever, and hiring someone back does not mean returning to the past; for both sides, it can be a strategic investment in what comes next.

Sources

• ADP. (2025). Boomerang employees: Should you rehire former employees? ADP.
• Gallup. (2026). State of the Global Workplace: 2026 report. Gallup.
• LinkedIn News. (2025). Boomerang hires are on the rise. LinkedIn.
• Society for Human Resource Management. (2025). 2025 benchmarking reports. SHRM.
• Society for Human Resource Management. (2026). Recruiting executives benchmarking: 2026 research. SHRM.
• UKG. (2022). Resign, resigned, or re-sign? The rise of the boomerang employee. UKG.
• U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2024). Employee tenure in 2024. U.S. Department of Labor.
• Visier. (2022). Boomerang employees: Who they are and why you should rehire them. Visier.